If you need only a specified number of rows from a result set,
use a LIMIT
clause in the query, rather
than fetching the whole result set and throwing away the extra
data.
MySQL sometimes optimizes a query that has a LIMIT
clause and no
row_count
HAVING
clause:
If you select only a few rows with
LIMIT
, MySQL uses indexes in some cases when normally it would prefer to do a full table scan.If you combine
LIMIT
withrow_count
ORDER BY
, MySQL stops sorting as soon as it has found the firstrow_count
rows of the sorted result, rather than sorting the entire result. If ordering is done by using an index, this is very fast. If a filesort must be done, all rows that match the query without theLIMIT
clause are selected, and most or all of them are sorted, before the firstrow_count
are found. After the initial rows have been found, MySQL does not sort any remainder of the result set.One manifestation of this behavior is that an
ORDER BY
query with and withoutLIMIT
may return rows in different order, as described later in this section.If you combine
LIMIT
withrow_count
DISTINCT
, MySQL stops as soon as it findsrow_count
unique rows.In some cases, a
GROUP BY
can be resolved by reading the index in order (or doing a sort on the index), then calculating summaries until the index value changes. In this case,LIMIT
does not calculate any unnecessaryrow_count
GROUP BY
values.As soon as MySQL has sent the required number of rows to the client, it aborts the query unless you are using
SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS
. In that case, the number of rows can be retrieved withSELECT FOUND_ROWS()
. See Section 12.15, “Information Functions”.LIMIT 0
quickly returns an empty set. This can be useful for checking the validity of a query. It can also be employed to obtain the types of the result columns within applications that use a MySQL API that makes result set metadata available. With the mysql client program, you can use the--column-type-info
option to display result column types.If the server uses temporary tables to resolve a query, it uses the
LIMIT
clause to calculate how much space is required.row_count
If an index is not used for
ORDER BY
but aLIMIT
clause is also present, the optimizer may be able to avoid using a merge file and sort the rows in memory using an in-memoryfilesort
operation.
If multiple rows have identical values in the ORDER
BY
columns, the server is free to return those rows
in any order, and may do so differently depending on the
overall execution plan. In other words, the sort order of
those rows is nondeterministic with respect to the nonordered
columns.
One factor that affects the execution plan is
LIMIT
, so an ORDER BY
query with and without LIMIT
may return
rows in different orders. Consider this query, which is sorted
by the category
column but nondeterministic
with respect to the id
and
rating
columns:
mysql> SELECT * FROM ratings ORDER BY category;
+----+----------+--------+
| id | category | rating |
+----+----------+--------+
| 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 5 | 1 | 3.2 |
| 3 | 2 | 3.7 |
| 4 | 2 | 3.5 |
| 6 | 2 | 3.5 |
| 2 | 3 | 5.0 |
| 7 | 3 | 2.7 |
+----+----------+--------+
Including LIMIT
may affect order of rows
within each category
value. For example,
this is a valid query result:
mysql> SELECT * FROM ratings ORDER BY category LIMIT 5;
+----+----------+--------+
| id | category | rating |
+----+----------+--------+
| 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 5 | 1 | 3.2 |
| 4 | 2 | 3.5 |
| 3 | 2 | 3.7 |
| 6 | 2 | 3.5 |
+----+----------+--------+
In each case, the rows are sorted by the ORDER
BY
column, which is all that is required by the SQL
standard.
If it is important to ensure the same row order with and
without LIMIT
, include additional columns
in the ORDER BY
clause to make the order
deterministic. For example, if id
values
are unique, you can make rows for a given
category
value appear in
id
order by sorting like this:
mysql> SELECT * FROM ratings ORDER BY category, id;
+----+----------+--------+
| id | category | rating |
+----+----------+--------+
| 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 5 | 1 | 3.2 |
| 3 | 2 | 3.7 |
| 4 | 2 | 3.5 |
| 6 | 2 | 3.5 |
| 2 | 3 | 5.0 |
| 7 | 3 | 2.7 |
+----+----------+--------+
mysql> SELECT * FROM ratings ORDER BY category, id LIMIT 5;
+----+----------+--------+
| id | category | rating |
+----+----------+--------+
| 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 5 | 1 | 3.2 |
| 3 | 2 | 3.7 |
| 4 | 2 | 3.5 |
| 6 | 2 | 3.5 |
+----+----------+--------+
For a query with an ORDER BY
or
GROUP BY
and a LIMIT
clause, the optimizer tries to choose an ordered index by
default when it appears doing so would speed up query
execution. Prior to MySQL 5.7.33, there was no way to override
this behavior, even in cases where using some other
optimization might be faster. Beginning with MySQL 5.7.33, it
is possible to turn off this optimization by setting the
optimizer_switch
system
variable's
prefer_ordering_index
flag
to off
.
Example: First we create and populate a
table t
as shown here:
# Create and populate a table t:
mysql> CREATE TABLE t (
-> id1 BIGINT NOT NULL,
-> id2 BIGINT NOT NULL,
-> c1 VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
-> c2 VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
-> PRIMARY KEY (id1),
-> INDEX i (id2, c1)
-> );
# [Insert some rows into table t - not shown]
Verify that the
prefer_ordering_index
flag
is enabled:
mysql> SELECT @@optimizer_switch LIKE '%prefer_ordering_index=on%';
+------------------------------------------------------+
| @@optimizer_switch LIKE '%prefer_ordering_index=on%' |
+------------------------------------------------------+
| 1 |
+------------------------------------------------------+
Since the following query has a LIMIT
clause, we expect it to use an ordered index, if possible. In
this case, as we can see from the
EXPLAIN
output, it uses the
table's primary key.
mysql> EXPLAIN SELECT c2 FROM t
-> WHERE id2 > 3
-> ORDER BY id1 ASC LIMIT 2\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
id: 1
select_type: SIMPLE
table: t
partitions: NULL
type: index
possible_keys: i
key: PRIMARY
key_len: 8
ref: NULL
rows: 2
filtered: 70.00
Extra: Using where
Now we disable the
prefer_ordering_index
flag,
and re-run the same query; this time it uses the index
i
(which includes the
id2
column used in the
WHERE
clause), and a filesort:
mysql> SET optimizer_switch = "prefer_ordering_index=off";
mysql> EXPLAIN SELECT c2 FROM t
-> WHERE id2 > 3
-> ORDER BY id1 ASC LIMIT 2\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
id: 1
select_type: SIMPLE
table: t
partitions: NULL
type: range
possible_keys: i
key: i
key_len: 8
ref: NULL
rows: 14
filtered: 100.00
Extra: Using index condition; Using filesort