You should be aware of the following points when using the
FEDERATED storage engine:
FEDERATEDtables may be replicated to other replicas, but you must ensure that the replica servers are able to use the user/password combination that is defined in the
CONNECTIONstring (or the row in the
mysql.serverstable) to connect to the remote server.
The following items indicate features that the
FEDERATED storage engine does and does not
The remote server must be a MySQL server.
The remote table that a
FEDERATEDtable points to must exist before you try to access the table through the
It is possible for one
FEDERATEDtable to point to another, but you must be careful not to create a loop.
FEDERATEDtable does not support indexes in the usual sense; because access to the table data is handled remotely, it is actually the remote table that makes use of indexes. This means that, for a query that cannot use any indexes and so requires a full table scan, the server fetches all rows from the remote table and filters them locally. This occurs regardless of any
LIMITused with this
SELECTstatement; these clauses are applied locally to the returned rows.
Queries that fail to use indexes can thus cause poor performance and network overload. In addition, since returned rows must be stored in memory, such a query can also lead to the local server swapping, or even hanging.
Care should be taken when creating a
FEDERATEDtable since the index definition from an equivalent
MyISAMor other table may not be supported. For example, creating a
FEDERATEDtable fails if the table uses an index prefix on any
BLOBcolumns. The following definition using
CREATE TABLE `T1`(`A` VARCHAR(100),UNIQUE KEY(`A`(30))) ENGINE=MYISAM;
The key prefix in this example is incompatible with the
FEDERATEDengine, and the equivalent statement fails:
CREATE TABLE `T1`(`A` VARCHAR(100),UNIQUE KEY(`A`(30))) ENGINE=FEDERATED CONNECTION='MYSQL://127.0.0.1:3306/TEST/T1';
If possible, you should try to separate the column and index definition when creating tables on both the remote server and the local server to avoid these index issues.
Internally, the implementation uses
DELETE, but not
FEDERATEDstorage engine supports
TRUNCATE TABLE, and indexes. It does not support
ALTER TABLE, or any Data Definition Language statements that directly affect the structure of the table, other than
DROP TABLE. The current implementation does not use prepared statements.
INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATEstatements, but if a duplicate-key violation occurs, the statement fails with an error.
Transactions are not supported.
FEDERATEDperforms bulk-insert handling such that multiple rows are sent to the remote table in a batch, which improves performance. Also, if the remote table is transactional, it enables the remote storage engine to perform statement rollback properly should an error occur. This capability has the following limitations:
The size of the insert cannot exceed the maximum packet size between servers. If the insert exceeds this size, it is broken into multiple packets and the rollback problem can occur.
Bulk-insert handling does not occur for
INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE.
There is no way for the
FEDERATEDengine to know if the remote table has changed. The reason for this is that this table must work like a data file that would never be written to by anything other than the database system. The integrity of the data in the local table could be breached if there was any change to the remote database.
When using a
CONNECTIONstring, you cannot use an '@' character in the password. You can get round this limitation by using the
CREATE SERVERstatement to create a server connection.
timestampoptions are not propagated to the data provider.
DROP TABLEstatement issued against a
FEDERATEDtable drops only the local table, not the remote table.
User-defined partitioning is not supported for