As of MySQL 5.6.5, the optimizer uses subquery materialization as a strategy that enables more efficient subquery processing.
If materialization is not used, the optimizer sometimes
rewrites a noncorrelated subquery as a correlated subquery.
For example, the following IN subquery is
noncorrelated (where_condition
involves only columns from t2 and not
t1):
SELECT * FROM t1
WHERE t1.a IN (SELECT t2.b FROM t2 WHERE where_condition);
The optimizer might rewrite this as an
EXISTS correlated subquery:
SELECT * FROM t1
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT t2.b FROM t2 WHERE where_condition AND t1.a=t2.b);
Subquery materialization using a temporary table avoids such rewrites and makes it possible to execute the subquery only once rather than once per row of the outer query. Materialization speeds up query execution by generating a subquery result as a temporary table, normally in memory. The first time MySQL needs the subquery result, it materializes that result into a temporary table. Any subsequent time the result is needed, MySQL refers again to the temporary table. The table is indexed with a hash index to make lookups fast and inexpensive. The index is unique, which makes the table smaller because it has no duplicates.
Subquery materialization attempts to use an in-memory temporary table when possible, falling back to on-disk storage if the table becomes too large. See Section 8.4.3.3, “How MySQL Uses Internal Temporary Tables”.
For subquery materialization to be used in MySQL, the
materialization flag of the
optimizer_switch system
variable must be on. Materialization then
applies to subquery predicates that appear anywhere (in the
select list, WHERE, ON,
GROUP BY, HAVING, or
ORDER BY), for predicates that fall into
any of these use cases:
The predicate has this form, when no outer expression
oe_i or inner expression
ie_i is nullable.
N can be 1 or larger.
(oe_1,oe_2, ...,oe_N) [NOT] IN (SELECTie_1,i_2, ...,ie_N...)
The predicate has this form, when there is a single outer
expression oe and inner
expression ie. The expressions
can be nullable.
oe[NOT] IN (SELECTie...)
The predicate is IN or NOT
IN and a result of UNKNOWN
(NULL) has the same meaning as a result
of FALSE.
The following examples illustrate how the requirement for
equivalence of UNKNOWN and
FALSE predicate evaluation affects whether
subquery materialization can be used. Assume that
where_condition involves columns
only from t2 and not t1
so that the subquery is noncorrelated.
This query is subject to materialization:
SELECT * FROM t1
WHERE t1.a IN (SELECT t2.b FROM t2 WHERE where_condition);
Here, it does not matter whether the IN
predicate returns UNKNOWN or
FALSE. Either way, the row from
t1 is not included in the query result.
An example where subquery materialization will not be used is
the following query, where t2.b is a
nullable column.
SELECT * FROM t1
WHERE (t1.a,t1.b) NOT IN (SELECT t2.a,t2.b FROM t2
WHERE where_condition);
Use of EXPLAIN with a query can
give some indication of whether the optimizer uses subquery
materialization. Compared to query execution that does not use
materialization, select_type may change
from DEPENDENT SUBQUERY to
SUBQUERY. This indicates that, for a
subquery that would be executed once per outer row,
materialization enables the subquery to be executed just once.
In addition, for EXPLAIN
EXTENDED, the text displayed by a following
SHOW WARNINGS will include
materialize materialize
and materialized-subquery
(materialized subselect before MySQL
5.6.6).

User Comments
Add your own comment.