Certain functions do not replicate well under some conditions:
The
USER()
,CURRENT_USER()
(orCURRENT_USER
),UUID()
,VERSION()
, andLOAD_FILE()
functions are replicated without change and thus do not work reliably on the replica unless row-based replication is enabled. (See Section 19.2.1, “Replication Formats”.)USER()
andCURRENT_USER()
are automatically replicated using row-based replication when usingMIXED
mode, and generate a warning inSTATEMENT
mode. (See also Section 19.5.1.8, “Replication of CURRENT_USER()”.) This is also true forVERSION()
andRAND()
.For
NOW()
, the binary log includes the timestamp. This means that the value as returned by the call to this function on the source is replicated to the replica. To avoid unexpected results when replicating between MySQL servers in different time zones, set the time zone on both source and replica. For more information, see Section 19.5.1.34, “Replication and Time Zones”.To explain the potential problems when replicating between servers which are in different time zones, suppose that the source is located in New York, the replica is located in Stockholm, and both servers are using local time. Suppose further that, on the source, you create a table
mytable
, perform anINSERT
statement on this table, and then select from the table, as shown here:mysql> CREATE TABLE mytable (mycol TEXT); Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.06 sec) mysql> INSERT INTO mytable VALUES ( NOW() ); Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec) mysql> SELECT * FROM mytable; +---------------------+ | mycol | +---------------------+ | 2009-09-01 12:00:00 | +---------------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
Local time in Stockholm is 6 hours later than in New York; so, if you issue
SELECT NOW()
on the replica at that exact same instant, the value2009-09-01 18:00:00
is returned. For this reason, if you select from the replica's copy ofmytable
after theCREATE TABLE
andINSERT
statements just shown have been replicated, you might expectmycol
to contain the value2009-09-01 18:00:00
. However, this is not the case; when you select from the replica's copy ofmytable
, you obtain exactly the same result as on the source:mysql> SELECT * FROM mytable; +---------------------+ | mycol | +---------------------+ | 2009-09-01 12:00:00 | +---------------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
Unlike
NOW()
, theSYSDATE()
function is not replication-safe because it is not affected bySET TIMESTAMP
statements in the binary log and is nondeterministic if statement-based logging is used. This is not a problem if row-based logging is used.An alternative is to use the
--sysdate-is-now
option to causeSYSDATE()
to be an alias forNOW()
. This must be done on the source and the replica to work correctly. In such cases, a warning is still issued by this function, but can safely be ignored as long as--sysdate-is-now
is used on both the source and the replica.SYSDATE()
is automatically replicated using row-based replication when usingMIXED
mode, and generates a warning inSTATEMENT
mode.The following restriction applies to statement-based replication only, not to row-based replication. The
GET_LOCK()
,RELEASE_LOCK()
,IS_FREE_LOCK()
, andIS_USED_LOCK()
functions that handle user-level locks are replicated without the replica knowing the concurrency context on the source. Therefore, these functions should not be used to insert into a source table because the content on the replica would differ. For example, do not issue a statement such asINSERT INTO mytable VALUES(GET_LOCK(...))
.These functions are automatically replicated using row-based replication when using
MIXED
mode, and generate a warning inSTATEMENT
mode.
As a workaround for the preceding limitations when
statement-based replication is in effect, you can use the
strategy of saving the problematic function result in a user
variable and referring to the variable in a later statement. For
example, the following single-row
INSERT
is problematic due to the
reference to the UUID()
function:
INSERT INTO t VALUES(UUID());
To work around the problem, do this instead:
SET @my_uuid = UUID();
INSERT INTO t VALUES(@my_uuid);
That sequence of statements replicates because the value of
@my_uuid
is stored in the binary log as a
user-variable event prior to the
INSERT
statement and is available
for use in the INSERT
.
The same idea applies to multiple-row inserts, but is more cumbersome to use. For a two-row insert, you can do this:
SET @my_uuid1 = UUID(); @my_uuid2 = UUID();
INSERT INTO t VALUES(@my_uuid1),(@my_uuid2);
However, if the number of rows is large or unknown, the workaround is difficult or impracticable. For example, you cannot convert the following statement to one in which a given individual user variable is associated with each row:
INSERT INTO t2 SELECT UUID(), * FROM t1;
Within a stored function, RAND()
replicates correctly as long as it is invoked only once during
the execution of the function. (You can consider the function
execution timestamp and random number seed as implicit inputs
that are identical on the source and replica.)
The FOUND_ROWS()
and
ROW_COUNT()
functions are not
replicated reliably using statement-based replication. A
workaround is to store the result of the function call in a user
variable, and then use that in the
INSERT
statement. For example, if
you wish to store the result in a table named
mytable
, you might normally do so like this:
SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS FROM mytable LIMIT 1;
INSERT INTO mytable VALUES( FOUND_ROWS() );
However, if you are replicating mytable
, you
should use SELECT
... INTO
, and then store the variable in the table,
like this:
SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS INTO @found_rows FROM mytable LIMIT 1;
INSERT INTO mytable VALUES(@found_rows);
In this way, the user variable is replicated as part of the context, and applied on the replica correctly.
These functions are automatically replicated using row-based
replication when using MIXED
mode, and
generate a warning in STATEMENT
mode. (Bug
#12092, Bug #30244)