EXPLAIN returns a row of
information for each table used in the
SELECT statement. It lists the
tables in the output in the order that MySQL would read them
while processing the statement. MySQL resolves all joins using a
nested-loop join method. This means that MySQL reads a row from
the first table, and then finds a matching row in the second
table, the third table, and so on. When all tables are
processed, MySQL outputs the selected columns and backtracks
through the table list until a table is found for which there
are more matching rows. The next row is read from this table and
the process continues with the next table.
EXTENDED keyword is used,
EXPLAIN produces extra
information that can be viewed by issuing a
SHOW WARNINGS statement following
EXPLAIN EXTENDED also displays
filtered column. See
Section 8.8.3, “EXPLAIN EXTENDED Output Format”.
You cannot use the
PARTITIONS keywords together in the same
Table 8.1 EXPLAIN Output Columns
|The table for the output row|
|The matching partitions|
|The join type|
|The possible indexes to choose|
|The index actually chosen|
|The length of the chosen key|
|The columns compared to the index|
|Estimate of rows to be examined|
|Percentage of rows filtered by table condition|
SELECTidentifier. This is the sequential number of the
SELECTwithin the query. The value can be
NULLif the row refers to the union result of other rows. In this case, the
tablecolumn shows a value like
<unionto indicate that the row refers to the union of the rows with
The type of
SELECT, which can be any of those shown in the following table.
Second or later
SELECTstatement in a
Second or later
SELECTstatement in a
UNION, dependent on outer query
Result of a
SELECTin subquery, dependent on outer query
A subquery for which the result cannot be cached and must be re-evaluated for each row of the outer query
The second or later select in a
UNIONthat belongs to an uncacheable subquery (see
DEPENDENTtypically signifies the use of a correlated subquery. See Section 184.108.40.206, “Correlated Subqueries”.
DEPENDENT SUBQUERYevaluation differs from
UNCACHEABLE SUBQUERYevaluation. For
DEPENDENT SUBQUERY, the subquery is re-evaluated only once for each set of different values of the variables from its outer context. For
UNCACHEABLE SUBQUERY, the subquery is re-evaluated for each row of the outer context.
Cacheability of subqueries differs from caching of query results in the query cache (which is described in Section 220.127.116.11, “How the Query Cache Operates”). Subquery caching occurs during query execution, whereas the query cache is used to store results only after query execution finishes.
The name of the table to which the row of output refers. This can also be one of the following values:
<union: The row refers to the union of the rows with
<derived: The row refers to the derived table result for the row with an
N. A derived table may result, for example, from a subquery in the
The partitions from which records would be matched by the query. This column is displayed only if the
PARTITIONSkeyword is used. The value is
NULLfor nonpartitioned tables. See Section 19.3.4, “Obtaining Information About Partitions”.
The join type. For descriptions of the different types, see
possible_keyscolumn indicates which indexes MySQL can choose from use to find the rows in this table. Note that this column is totally independent of the order of the tables as displayed in the output from
EXPLAIN. That means that some of the keys in
possible_keysmight not be usable in practice with the generated table order.
If this column is
NULL, there are no relevant indexes. In this case, you may be able to improve the performance of your query by examining the
WHEREclause to check whether it refers to some column or columns that would be suitable for indexing. If so, create an appropriate index and check the query with
EXPLAINagain. See Section 13.1.7, “ALTER TABLE Syntax”.
To see what indexes a table has, use
SHOW INDEX FROM.
keycolumn indicates the key (index) that MySQL actually decided to use. If MySQL decides to use one of the
possible_keysindexes to look up rows, that index is listed as the key value.
It is possible that
keywill name an index that is not present in the
possible_keysvalue. This can happen if none of the
possible_keysindexes are suitable for looking up rows, but all the columns selected by the query are columns of some other index. That is, the named index covers the selected columns, so although it is not used to determine which rows to retrieve, an index scan is more efficient than a data row scan.
InnoDB, a secondary index might cover the selected columns even if the query also selects the primary key because
InnoDBstores the primary key value with each secondary index. If
NULL, MySQL found no index to use for executing the query more efficiently.
To force MySQL to use or ignore an index listed in the
USE INDEX, or
IGNORE INDEXin your query. See Section 8.9.3, “Index Hints”.
ANALYZE TABLEhelps the optimizer choose better indexes. For
NDBtables, this also improves performance of distributed pushed-down joins. For
MyISAMtables, myisamchk --analyze does the same as
ANALYZE TABLE. See Section 7.6, “MyISAM Table Maintenance and Crash Recovery”.
key_lencolumn indicates the length of the key that MySQL decided to use. The length is
NULL. Note that the value of
key_lenenables you to determine how many parts of a multiple-part key MySQL actually uses.
refcolumn shows which columns or constants are compared to the index named in the
keycolumn to select rows from the table.
rowscolumn indicates the number of rows MySQL believes it must examine to execute the query.
InnoDBtables, this number is an estimate, and may not always be exact.
filteredcolumn indicates an estimated percentage of table rows that will be filtered by the table condition. That is,
rowsshows the estimated number of rows examined and
100shows the number of rows that will be joined with previous tables. This column is displayed if you use
This column contains additional information about how MySQL resolves the query. For descriptions of the different values, see
type column of
EXPLAIN output describes how
tables are joined. The following list describes the join types,
ordered from the best type to the worst:
The table has only one row (= system table). This is a special case of the
The table has at most one matching row, which is read at the start of the query. Because there is only one row, values from the column in this row can be regarded as constants by the rest of the optimizer.
consttables are very fast because they are read only once.
SELECT * FROM
primary_key=1; SELECT * FROM
One row is read from this table for each combination of rows from the previous tables. Other than the
consttypes, this is the best possible join type. It is used when all parts of an index are used by the join and the index is a
UNIQUE NOT NULLindex.
eq_refcan be used for indexed columns that are compared using the
=operator. The comparison value can be a constant or an expression that uses columns from tables that are read before this table. In the following examples, MySQL can use an
eq_refjoin to process
SELECT * FROM
column; SELECT * FROM
All rows with matching index values are read from this table for each combination of rows from the previous tables.
refis used if the join uses only a leftmost prefix of the key or if the key is not a
UNIQUEindex (in other words, if the join cannot select a single row based on the key value). If the key that is used matches only a few rows, this is a good join type.
SELECT * FROM
expr; SELECT * FROM
column; SELECT * FROM
The join is performed using a
This join type is like
ref, but with the addition that MySQL does an extra search for rows that contain
NULLvalues. This join type optimization is used most often in resolving subqueries. In the following examples, MySQL can use a
ref_or_nulljoin to process
SELECT * FROM
This join type indicates that the Index Merge optimization is used. In this case, the
keycolumn in the output row contains a list of indexes used, and
key_lencontains a list of the longest key parts for the indexes used. For more information, see Section 18.104.22.168, “Index Merge Optimization”.
This type replaces
INsubqueries of the following form:
unique_subqueryis just an index lookup function that replaces the subquery completely for better efficiency.
This join type is similar to
unique_subquery. It replaces
INsubqueries, but it works for nonunique indexes in subqueries of the following form:
Only rows that are in a given range are retrieved, using an index to select the rows. The
keycolumn in the output row indicates which index is used. The
key_lencontains the longest key part that was used. The
NULLfor this type.
SELECT * FROM
key_column= 10; SELECT * FROM
key_columnBETWEEN 10 and 20; SELECT * FROM
key_columnIN (10,20,30); SELECT * FROM
key_part1= 10 AND
indexjoin type is the same as
ALL, except that the index tree is scanned. This occurs two ways:
If the index is a covering index for the queries and can be used to satisfy all data required from the table, only the index tree is scanned. In this case, the
Using index. An index-only scan usually is faster than
ALLbecause the size of the index usually is smaller than the table data.
A full table scan is performed using reads from the index to look up data rows in index order.
Uses indexdoes not appear in the
MySQL can use this join type when the query uses only columns that are part of a single index.
A full table scan is done for each combination of rows from the previous tables. This is normally not good if the table is the first table not marked
const, and usually very bad in all other cases. Normally, you can avoid
ALLby adding indexes that enable row retrieval from the table based on constant values or column values from earlier tables.
Extra column of
EXPLAIN output contains
additional information about how MySQL resolves the query. The
following list explains the values that can appear in this
column. If you want to make your queries as fast as possible,
look out for
Extra values of
Child of '
table' pushed join@1
This table is referenced as the child of
tablein a join that can be pushed down to the NDB kernel. Applies only in MySQL Cluster NDB 7.2 and later, when pushed-down joins are enabled. See the description of the
ndb_join_pushdownserver system variable for more information and examples.
const row not found
For a query such as
SELECT ... FROM, the table was empty.
MySQL is looking for distinct values, so it stops searching for more rows for the current row combination after it has found the first matching row.
Full scan on NULL key
This occurs for subquery optimization as a fallback strategy when the optimizer cannot use an index-lookup access method.
HAVINGclause is always false and cannot select any rows.
WHEREclause is always false and cannot select any rows.
Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables
No matching min/max row
No row satisfies the condition for a query such as
SELECT MIN(...) FROM ... WHERE.
no matching row in const table
For a query with a join, there was an empty table or a table with no rows satisfying a unique index condition.
No tables used
The query has no
FROMclause, or has a
MySQL was able to do a
LEFT JOINoptimization on the query and does not examine more rows in this table for the previous row combination after it finds one row that matches the
LEFT JOINcriteria. Here is an example of the type of query that can be optimized this way:
SELECT * FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 ON t1.id=t2.id WHERE t2.id IS NULL;
t2.idis defined as
NOT NULL. In this case, MySQL scans
t1and looks up the rows in
t2using the values of
t1.id. If MySQL finds a matching row in
t2, it knows that
t2.idcan never be
NULL, and does not scan through the rest of the rows in
t2that have the same
idvalue. In other words, for each row in
t1, MySQL needs to do only a single lookup in
t2, regardless of how many rows actually match in
Range checked for each record (index map:
MySQL found no good index to use, but found that some of indexes might be used after column values from preceding tables are known. For each row combination in the preceding tables, MySQL checks whether it is possible to use a
index_mergeaccess method to retrieve rows. This is not very fast, but is faster than performing a join with no index at all. The applicability criteria are as described in Section 22.214.171.124, “Range Optimization”, and Section 126.96.36.199, “Index Merge Optimization”, with the exception that all column values for the preceding table are known and considered to be constants.
Indexes are numbered beginning with 1, in the same order as shown by
SHOW INDEXfor the table. The index map value
Nis a bitmask value that indicates which indexes are candidates. For example, a value of
0x19(binary 11001) means that indexes 1, 4, and 5 will be considered.
This indicates how many directory scans the server performs when processing a query for
INFORMATION_SCHEMAtables, as described in Section 8.2.4, “Optimizing INFORMATION_SCHEMA Queries”. The value of
Ncan be 0, 1, or
Select tables optimized away
The optimizer determined 1) that at most one row should be returned, and 2) that to produce this row, a deterministic set of rows must be read. When the rows to be read can be read during the optimization phase (for example, by reading index rows), there is no need to read any tables during query execution.
The first condition is fulfilled when the query is implicitly grouped (contains an aggregate function but no
GROUP BYclause). The second condition is fulfilled when one row lookup is performed per index used. The number of indexes read determines the number of rows to read.
Consider the following implicitly grouped query:
SELECT MIN(c1), MIN(c2) FROM t1;
MIN(c1)can be retrieved by reading one index row and
MIN(c2)can be retrieved by reading one row from a different index. That is, for each column
c2, there exists an index where the column is the first column of the index. In this case, one row is returned, produced by reading two deterministic rows.
Extravalue does not occur if the rows to read are not deterministic. Consider this query:
SELECT MIN(c2) FROM t1 WHERE c1 <= 10;
(c1, c2)is a covering index. Using this index, all rows with
c1 <= 10must be scanned to find the minimum
c2value. By contrast, consider this query:
SELECT MIN(c2) FROM t1 WHERE c1 = 10;
In this case, the first index row with
c1 = 10contains the minimum
c2value. Only one row must be read to produce the returned row.
For storage engines that maintain an exact row count per table (such as
MyISAM, but not
Extravalue can occur for
COUNT(*)queries for which the
WHEREclause is missing or always true and there is no
GROUP BYclause. (This is an instance of an implicitly grouped query where the storage engine influences whether a deterministic number of rows can be read.)
These values indicate file-opening optimizations that apply to queries for
INFORMATION_SCHEMAtables, as described in Section 8.2.4, “Optimizing INFORMATION_SCHEMA Queries”.
Skip_open_table: Table files do not need to be opened. The information has already become available within the query by scanning the database directory.
Open_frm_only: Only the table's
.frmfile need be opened.
Open_trigger_only: Only the table's
.TRGfile need be opened.
Open_full_table: The unoptimized information lookup. The
.MYIfiles must be opened.
unique row not found
For a query such as
SELECT ... FROM, no rows satisfy the condition for a
PRIMARY KEYon the table.
MySQL must do an extra pass to find out how to retrieve the rows in sorted order. The sort is done by going through all rows according to the join type and storing the sort key and pointer to the row for all rows that match the
WHEREclause. The keys then are sorted and the rows are retrieved in sorted order. See Section 188.8.131.52, “ORDER BY Optimization”.
The column information is retrieved from the table using only information in the index tree without having to do an additional seek to read the actual row. This strategy can be used when the query uses only columns that are part of a single index.
InnoDBtables that have a user-defined clustered index, that index can be used even when
Using indexis absent from the
Extracolumn. This is the case if
Using index for group-by
Similar to the
Using indextable access method,
Using index for group-byindicates that MySQL found an index that can be used to retrieve all columns of a
DISTINCTquery without any extra disk access to the actual table. Additionally, the index is used in the most efficient way so that for each group, only a few index entries are read. For details, see Section 184.108.40.206, “GROUP BY Optimization”.
Using join buffer
Tables from earlier joins are read in portions into the join buffer, and then their rows are used from the buffer to perform the join with the current table.
To resolve the query, MySQL needs to create a temporary table to hold the result. This typically happens if the query contains
ORDER BYclauses that list columns differently.
WHEREclause is used to restrict which rows to match against the next table or send to the client. Unless you specifically intend to fetch or examine all rows from the table, you may have something wrong in your query if the
Extravalue is not
Using whereand the table join type is
index. Even if you are using an index for all parts of a
WHEREclause, you may see
Using whereif the column can be
Using where with pushed condition
This item applies to
NDBtables only. It means that MySQL Cluster is using the Condition Pushdown optimization to improve the efficiency of a direct comparison between a nonindexed column and a constant. In such cases, the condition is “pushed down” to the cluster's data nodes and is evaluated on all data nodes simultaneously. This eliminates the need to send nonmatching rows over the network, and can speed up such queries by a factor of 5 to 10 times over cases where Condition Pushdown could be but is not used. For more information, see Section 220.127.116.11, “Engine Condition Pushdown Optimization”.
You can get a good indication of how good a join is by taking
the product of the values in the
EXPLAIN output. This
should tell you roughly how many rows MySQL must examine to
execute the query. If you restrict queries with the
max_join_size system variable,
this row product also is used to determine which multiple-table
SELECT statements to execute and
which to abort. See Section 8.12.2, “Tuning Server Parameters”.
The following example shows how a multiple-table join can be
optimized progressively based on the information provided by
EXPLAIN SELECT tt.TicketNumber, tt.TimeIn, tt.ProjectReference, tt.EstimatedShipDate, tt.ActualShipDate, tt.ClientID, tt.ServiceCodes, tt.RepetitiveID, tt.CurrentProcess, tt.CurrentDPPerson, tt.RecordVolume, tt.DPPrinted, et.COUNTRY, et_1.COUNTRY, do.CUSTNAME FROM tt, et, et AS et_1, do WHERE tt.SubmitTime IS NULL AND tt.ActualPC = et.EMPLOYID AND tt.AssignedPC = et_1.EMPLOYID AND tt.ClientID = do.CUSTNMBR;
For this example, make the following assumptions:
The columns being compared have been declared as follows.
Table Column Data Type
The tables have the following indexes.
tt.ActualPCvalues are not evenly distributed.
Initially, before any optimizations have been performed, the
EXPLAIN statement produces the
table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra et ALL PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 74 do ALL PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 2135 et_1 ALL PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 74 tt ALL AssignedPC, NULL NULL NULL 3872 ClientID, ActualPC Range checked for each record (index map: 0x23)
ALL for each table, this
output indicates that MySQL is generating a Cartesian product of
all the tables; that is, every combination of rows. This takes
quite a long time, because the product of the number of rows in
each table must be examined. For the case at hand, this product
is 74 × 2135 × 74 × 3872 = 45,268,558,720
rows. If the tables were bigger, you can only imagine how long
it would take.
One problem here is that MySQL can use indexes on columns more
efficiently if they are declared as the same type and size. In
CHAR are considered the same if
they are declared as the same size.
tt.ActualPC is declared as
CHAR(15), so there is a length mismatch.
To fix this disparity between column lengths, use
ALTER TABLE to lengthen
ActualPC from 10 characters to 15 characters:
ALTER TABLE tt MODIFY ActualPC VARCHAR(15);
et.EMPLOYID are both
VARCHAR(15). Executing the
EXPLAIN statement again produces
table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra tt ALL AssignedPC, NULL NULL NULL 3872 Using ClientID, where ActualPC do ALL PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 2135 Range checked for each record (index map: 0x1) et_1 ALL PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 74 Range checked for each record (index map: 0x1) et eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 15 tt.ActualPC 1
This is not perfect, but is much better: The product of the
rows values is less by a factor of 74. This
version executes in a couple of seconds.
A second alteration can be made to eliminate the column length
mismatches for the
ALTER TABLE tt MODIFY AssignedPC VARCHAR(15),->
MODIFY ClientID VARCHAR(15);
After that modification,
produces the output shown here:
table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra et ALL PRIMARY NULL NULL NULL 74 tt ref AssignedPC, ActualPC 15 et.EMPLOYID 52 Using ClientID, where ActualPC et_1 eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 15 tt.AssignedPC 1 do eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 15 tt.ClientID 1
At this point, the query is optimized almost as well as
possible. The remaining problem is that, by default, MySQL
assumes that values in the
are evenly distributed, and that is not the case for the
tt table. Fortunately, it is easy to tell
MySQL to analyze the key distribution:
ANALYZE TABLE tt;
With the additional index information, the join is perfect and
EXPLAIN produces this result:
table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra tt ALL AssignedPC NULL NULL NULL 3872 Using ClientID, where ActualPC et eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 15 tt.ActualPC 1 et_1 eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 15 tt.AssignedPC 1 do eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 15 tt.ClientID 1
rows column in the output from
EXPLAIN is an educated guess from
the MySQL join optimizer. Check whether the numbers are even
close to the truth by comparing the
product with the actual number of rows that the query returns.
If the numbers are quite different, you might get better
performance by using
STRAIGHT_JOIN in your
SELECT statement and trying to
list the tables in a different order in the
It is possible in some cases to execute statements that modify
SELECT is used with a subquery; for more information,
see Section 18.104.22.168, “Subqueries in the FROM Clause”.