Certain optimizations are applicable to comparisons that use
the IN (or =ANY)
operator to test subquery results. This section discusses
these optimizations, particularly with regard to the
challenges that NULL values present. The
last part of the discussion suggests how you can help the
optimizer.
Consider the following subquery comparison:
outer_expr IN (SELECT inner_expr FROM ... WHERE subquery_where)
MySQL evaluates queries “from outside to inside.”
That is, it first obtains the value of the outer expression
outer_expr, and then runs the
subquery and captures the rows that it produces.
A very useful optimization is to “inform” the
subquery that the only rows of interest are those where the
inner expression inner_expr is
equal to outer_expr. This is done
by pushing down an appropriate equality into the
subquery's WHERE clause to make it
more restrictive. The converted comparison looks like this:
EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM ... WHERE subquery_where AND outer_expr=inner_expr)After the conversion, MySQL can use the pushed-down equality to limit the number of rows it must examine to evaluate the subquery.
More generally, a comparison of N
values to a subquery that returns
N-value rows is subject to the same
conversion. If oe_i and
ie_i represent corresponding outer
and inner expression values, this subquery comparison:
(oe_1, ..., oe_N) IN
(SELECT ie_1, ..., ie_N FROM ... WHERE subquery_where)Becomes:
EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM ... WHERE subquery_where
AND oe_1 = ie_1
AND ...
AND oe_N = ie_N)For simplicity, the following discussion assumes a single pair of outer and inner expression values.
The “pushdown” strategy just described works if either of these conditions is true:
outer_exprandinner_exprcannot beNULL.You need not distinguish
NULLfromFALSEsubquery results. If the subquery is a part of anORorANDexpression in theWHEREclause, MySQL assumes that you do not care. Another instance where the optimizer notices thatNULLandFALSEsubquery results need not be distinguished is this construct:... WHERE outer_expr IN (subquery)In this case, the
WHEREclause rejects the row whetherIN (returnssubquery)NULLorFALSE.
Suppose that outer_expr is known to
be a non-NULL value but the subquery does
not produce a row such that
outer_expr =
inner_expr. Then
evaluates as follows:
outer_expr IN (SELECT
...)
In this situation, the approach of looking for rows with
is no longer
valid. It is necessary to look for such rows, but if none are
found, also look for rows where
outer_expr =
inner_exprinner_expr is
NULL. Roughly speaking, the subquery can be
converted to something like this:
EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM ... WHERE subquery_where AND
(outer_expr=inner_expr OR inner_expr IS NULL))
The need to evaluate the extra IS
NULL condition is why MySQL has the
ref_or_null access method:
mysql> EXPLAIN
SELECT outer_expr IN (SELECT t2.maybe_null_key
FROM t2, t3 WHERE ...)
FROM t1;
*************************** 1. row ***************************
id: 1
select_type: PRIMARY
table: t1
...
*************************** 2. row ***************************
id: 2
select_type: DEPENDENT SUBQUERY
table: t2
type: ref_or_null
possible_keys: maybe_null_key
key: maybe_null_key
key_len: 5
ref: func
rows: 2
Extra: Using where; Using index
...
The unique_subquery and
index_subquery
subquery-specific access methods also have “or
NULL” variants.
The additional OR ... IS NULL condition
makes query execution slightly more complicated (and some
optimizations within the subquery become inapplicable), but
generally this is tolerable.
The situation is much worse when
outer_expr can be
NULL. According to the SQL interpretation
of NULL as “unknown value,”
NULL IN (SELECT should evaluate to:
inner_expr
...)
For proper evaluation, it is necessary to be able to check
whether the SELECT has produced
any rows at all, so
cannot be
pushed down into the subquery. This is a problem because many
real world subqueries become very slow unless the equality can
be pushed down.
outer_expr =
inner_expr
Essentially, there must be different ways to execute the
subquery depending on the value of
outer_expr.
The optimizer chooses SQL compliance over speed, so it
accounts for the possibility that
outer_expr might be
NULL:
If
outer_exprisNULL, to evaluate the following expression, it is necessary to execute theSELECTto determine whether it produces any rows:NULL IN (SELECT inner_expr FROM ... WHERE subquery_where)It is necessary to execute the original
SELECThere, without any pushed-down equalities of the kind mentioned previously.On the other hand, when
outer_expris notNULL, it is absolutely essential that this comparison:outer_expr IN (SELECT inner_expr FROM ... WHERE subquery_where)Be converted to this expression that uses a pushed-down condition:
EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM ... WHERE subquery_where AND outer_expr=inner_expr)Without this conversion, subqueries are slow.
To solve the dilemma of whether or not to push down conditions into the subquery, the conditions are wrapped within “trigger” functions. Thus, an expression of the following form:
outer_expr IN (SELECT inner_expr FROM ... WHERE subquery_where)Is converted into:
EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM ... WHERE subquery_where
AND trigcond(outer_expr=inner_expr))More generally, if the subquery comparison is based on several pairs of outer and inner expressions, the conversion takes this comparison:
(oe_1, ..., oe_N) IN (SELECT ie_1, ..., ie_N FROM ... WHERE subquery_where)And converts it to this expression:
EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM ... WHERE subquery_where
AND trigcond(oe_1=ie_1)
AND ...
AND trigcond(oe_N=ie_N)
)
Each trigcond(
is a special function that evaluates to the following values:
X)
Xwhen the “linked” outer expressionoe_iis notNULLTRUEwhen the “linked” outer expressionoe_iisNULL
Trigger functions are not triggers of
the kind that you create with CREATE
TRIGGER.
Equalities that are wrapped within
trigcond() functions are not first class
predicates for the query optimizer. Most optimizations cannot
deal with predicates that may be turned on and off at query
execution time, so they assume any
trigcond( to
be an unknown function and ignore it. Triggered equalities can
be used by those optimizations:
X)
Reference optimizations:
trigcond(can be used to constructX=Y[ORYIS NULL])ref,eq_ref, orref_or_nulltable accesses.Index lookup-based subquery execution engines:
trigcond(can be used to constructX=Y)unique_subqueryorindex_subqueryaccesses.Table-condition generator: If the subquery is a join of several tables, the triggered condition is checked as soon as possible.
When the optimizer uses a triggered condition to create some
kind of index lookup-based access (as for the first two items
of the preceding list), it must have a fallback strategy for
the case when the condition is turned off. This fallback
strategy is always the same: Do a full table scan. In
EXPLAIN output, the fallback
shows up as Full scan on NULL key in the
Extra column:
mysql> EXPLAIN SELECT t1.col1,
t1.col1 IN (SELECT t2.key1 FROM t2 WHERE t2.col2=t1.col2) FROM t1\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
id: 1
select_type: PRIMARY
table: t1
...
*************************** 2. row ***************************
id: 2
select_type: DEPENDENT SUBQUERY
table: t2
type: index_subquery
possible_keys: key1
key: key1
key_len: 5
ref: func
rows: 2
Extra: Using where; Full scan on NULL key
If you run EXPLAIN followed by
SHOW WARNINGS, you can see the
triggered condition:
*************************** 1. row ***************************
Level: Note
Code: 1003
Message: select `test`.`t1`.`col1` AS `col1`,
<in_optimizer>(`test`.`t1`.`col1`,
<exists>(<index_lookup>(<cache>(`test`.`t1`.`col1`) in t2
on key1 checking NULL
where (`test`.`t2`.`col2` = `test`.`t1`.`col2`) having
trigcond(<is_not_null_test>(`test`.`t2`.`key1`))))) AS
`t1.col1 IN (select t2.key1 from t2 where t2.col2=t1.col2)`
from `test`.`t1`
The use of triggered conditions has some performance
implications. A NULL IN (SELECT ...)
expression now may cause a full table scan (which is slow)
when it previously did not. This is the price paid for correct
results (the goal of the trigger-condition strategy is to
improve compliance, not speed).
For multiple-table subqueries, execution of NULL IN
(SELECT ...) is particularly slow because the join
optimizer does not optimize for the case where the outer
expression is NULL. It assumes that
subquery evaluations with NULL on the left
side are very rare, even if there are statistics that indicate
otherwise. On the other hand, if the outer expression might be
NULL but never actually is, there is no
performance penalty.
To help the query optimizer better execute your queries, use these suggestions:
Declare a column as
NOT NULLif it really is. This also helps other aspects of the optimizer by simplifying condition testing for the column.If you need not distinguish a
NULLfromFALSEsubquery result, you can easily avoid the slow execution path. Replace a comparison that looks like this:outer_expr [NOT] IN (SELECT inner_expr FROM ...)with this expression:
(outer_expr IS NOT NULL) AND (outer_expr [NOT] IN (SELECT inner_expr FROM ...))Then
NULL IN (SELECT ...)is never evaluated because MySQL stops evaluatingANDparts as soon as the expression result is clear.Another possible rewrite:
[NOT] EXISTS (SELECT inner_expr FROM ... WHERE inner_expr=outer_expr)
The
subquery_materialization_cost_based
flag of the optimizer_switch
system variable enables control over the choice between
subquery materialization and
IN-to-EXISTS subquery
transformation. See
Section 10.9.2, “Switchable Optimizations”.