REPLACE [LOW_PRIORITY | DELAYED]
[INTO] tbl_name
[PARTITION (partition_name [, partition_name] ...)]
[(col_name [, col_name] ...)]
{ {VALUES | VALUE} (value_list) [, (value_list)] ...
|
VALUES row_constructor_list
}
REPLACE [LOW_PRIORITY | DELAYED]
[INTO] tbl_name
[PARTITION (partition_name [, partition_name] ...)]
SET assignment_list
REPLACE [LOW_PRIORITY | DELAYED]
[INTO] tbl_name
[PARTITION (partition_name [, partition_name] ...)]
[(col_name [, col_name] ...)]
{SELECT ... | TABLE table_name}
value:
{expr | DEFAULT}
value_list:
value [, value] ...
row_constructor_list:
ROW(value_list)[, ROW(value_list)][, ...]
assignment:
col_name = value
assignment_list:
assignment [, assignment] ...
REPLACE
works exactly like
INSERT
, except that if an old row
in the table has the same value as a new row for a
PRIMARY KEY
or a UNIQUE
index, the old row is deleted before the new row is inserted. See
Section 15.2.7, “INSERT Statement”.
REPLACE
is a MySQL extension to the
SQL standard. It either inserts, or deletes
and inserts. For another MySQL extension to standard
SQL—that either inserts or
updates—see
Section 15.2.7.2, “INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE Statement”.
DELAYED
inserts and replaces were deprecated in
MySQL 5.6. In MySQL 8.4, DELAYED
is not supported. The server recognizes but ignores the
DELAYED
keyword, handles the replace as a
nondelayed replace, and generates an
ER_WARN_LEGACY_SYNTAX_CONVERTED
warning: REPLACE DELAYED is no longer supported. The
statement was converted to REPLACE. The
DELAYED
keyword is scheduled for removal in a
future release. release.
REPLACE
makes sense only if a
table has a PRIMARY KEY
or
UNIQUE
index. Otherwise, it becomes
equivalent to INSERT
, because
there is no index to be used to determine whether a new row
duplicates another.
Values for all columns are taken from the values specified in the
REPLACE
statement. Any missing
columns are set to their default values, just as happens for
INSERT
. You cannot refer to values
from the current row and use them in the new row. If you use an
assignment such as SET
, the reference
to the column name on the right hand side is treated as
col_name
=
col_name
+ 1DEFAULT(
,
so the assignment is equivalent to col_name
)SET
.
col_name
=
DEFAULT(col_name
) + 1
You can specify the column values that REPLACE
attempts to insert using
VALUES ROW()
.
To use REPLACE
, you must have both
the INSERT
and
DELETE
privileges for the table.
If a generated column is replaced explicitly, the only permitted
value is DEFAULT
. For information about
generated columns, see
Section 15.1.20.8, “CREATE TABLE and Generated Columns”.
REPLACE
supports explicit partition selection
using the PARTITION
clause with a list of
comma-separated names of partitions, subpartitions, or both. As
with INSERT
, if it is not possible
to insert the new row into any of these partitions or
subpartitions, the REPLACE
statement fails with
the error Found a row not matching the given partition
set. For more information and examples, see
Section 26.5, “Partition Selection”.
The REPLACE
statement returns a
count to indicate the number of rows affected. This is the sum of
the rows deleted and inserted. If the count is 1 for a single-row
REPLACE
, a row was inserted and no
rows were deleted. If the count is greater than 1, one or more old
rows were deleted before the new row was inserted. It is possible
for a single row to replace more than one old row if the table
contains multiple unique indexes and the new row duplicates values
for different old rows in different unique indexes.
The affected-rows count makes it easy to determine whether
REPLACE
only added a row or whether
it also replaced any rows: Check whether the count is 1 (added) or
greater (replaced).
If you are using the C API, the affected-rows count can be
obtained using the
mysql_affected_rows()
function.
You cannot replace into a table and select from the same table in a subquery.
MySQL uses the following algorithm for
REPLACE
(and
LOAD DATA ...
REPLACE
):
Try to insert the new row into the table
While the insertion fails because a duplicate-key error occurs for a primary key or unique index:
Delete from the table the conflicting row that has the duplicate key value
Try again to insert the new row into the table
It is possible that in the case of a duplicate-key error, a
storage engine may perform the REPLACE
as an
update rather than a delete plus insert, but the semantics are the
same. There are no user-visible effects other than a possible
difference in how the storage engine increments
Handler_
status
variables.
xxx
Because the results of REPLACE ... SELECT
statements depend on the ordering of rows from the
SELECT
and this order cannot always
be guaranteed, it is possible when logging these statements for
the source and the replica to diverge. For this reason,
REPLACE ... SELECT
statements are flagged as
unsafe for statement-based replication. such statements produce a
warning in the error log when using statement-based mode and are
written to the binary log using the row-based format when using
MIXED
mode. See also
Section 19.2.1.1, “Advantages and Disadvantages of Statement-Based and Row-Based
Replication”.
MySQL 8.4 supports
TABLE
as well as
SELECT
with
REPLACE
, just as it does with
INSERT
. See
Section 15.2.7.1, “INSERT ... SELECT Statement”, for more information and
examples.
When modifying an existing table that is not partitioned to
accommodate partitioning, or, when modifying the partitioning of
an already partitioned table, you may consider altering the
table's primary key (see
Section 26.6.1, “Partitioning Keys, Primary Keys, and Unique Keys”).
You should be aware that, if you do this, the results of
REPLACE
statements may be affected, just as
they would be if you modified the primary key of a nonpartitioned
table. Consider the table created by the following
CREATE TABLE
statement:
CREATE TABLE test (
id INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
data VARCHAR(64) DEFAULT NULL,
ts TIMESTAMP NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
PRIMARY KEY (id)
);
When we create this table and run the statements shown in the mysql client, the result is as follows:
mysql> REPLACE INTO test VALUES (1, 'Old', '2014-08-20 18:47:00');
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.04 sec)
mysql> REPLACE INTO test VALUES (1, 'New', '2014-08-20 18:47:42');
Query OK, 2 rows affected (0.04 sec)
mysql> SELECT * FROM test;
+----+------+---------------------+
| id | data | ts |
+----+------+---------------------+
| 1 | New | 2014-08-20 18:47:42 |
+----+------+---------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
Now we create a second table almost identical to the first, except that the primary key now covers 2 columns, as shown here (emphasized text):
CREATE TABLE test2 (
id INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
data VARCHAR(64) DEFAULT NULL,
ts TIMESTAMP NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
PRIMARY KEY (id, ts)
);
When we run on test2
the same two
REPLACE
statements as we did on the original
test
table, we obtain a different result:
mysql> REPLACE INTO test2 VALUES (1, 'Old', '2014-08-20 18:47:00');
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.05 sec)
mysql> REPLACE INTO test2 VALUES (1, 'New', '2014-08-20 18:47:42');
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.06 sec)
mysql> SELECT * FROM test2;
+----+------+---------------------+
| id | data | ts |
+----+------+---------------------+
| 1 | Old | 2014-08-20 18:47:00 |
| 1 | New | 2014-08-20 18:47:42 |
+----+------+---------------------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
This is due to the fact that, when run on
test2
, both the id
and
ts
column values must match those of an
existing row for the row to be replaced; otherwise, a row is
inserted.