The following items indicate features that the
FEDERATED storage engine does and does not
support:
The remote server must be a MySQL server. Support by
FEDERATED for other database engines may be
added in the future.
The remote table that a FEDERATED table
points to must exist before you try to
access the table through the FEDERATED
table.
It is possible for one FEDERATED table to
point to another, but you must be careful not to create a
loop.
There is no support for transactions.
A FEDERATED table does not support indexes
per se. Because access to the table is handled remotely, it is
the remote table that supports the indexes. Care should be
taken when creating a FEDERATED table since
the index definition from an equivalent
MyISAM or other table may not be supported.
For example, creating a FEDERATED table
with an index prefix on VARCHAR,
TEXT or BLOB columns
will fail. The following definition in
MyISAM is valid:
CREATE TABLE `T1`(`A` VARCHAR(100),UNIQUE KEY(`A`(30))) ENGINE=MYISAM;
The key prefix in this example is incompatible with the
FEDERATED engine, and the equivalent
statement will fail:
CREATE TABLE `T1`(`A` VARCHAR(100),UNIQUE KEY(`A`(30))) ENGINE=FEDERATED CONNECTION='MYSQL://127.0.0.1:3306/TEST/T1';
If possible, you should try to separate the column and index definition when creating tables on both the remote server and the local server to avoid these index issues.
Internally, the implementation uses SELECT,
INSERT, UPDATE, and
DELETE, but not HANDLER.
The FEDERATED storage engine supports
SELECT, INSERT,
UPDATE, DELETE, and
indexes. It does not support ALTER TABLE,
or any Data Definition Language statements that directly
affect the structure of the table, other than DROP
TABLE. The current implementation does not use
prepared statements.
FEDERATED accepts INSERT ... ON
DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE statements, but if a
duplicate-key violation occurs, the statement fails with an
error.
Performance on a FEDERATED table when
performing bulk inserts (for example, on a INSERT
INTO ... SELECT ... statement) is slower than with
other table types because each selected row is treated as an
individual INSERT statement on the
federated table.
Before MySQL 5.0.46, for a multiple-row insert into a
FEDERATED table that refers to a remote
transactional table, if the insert failed for a row due to
constraint failure, the remote table would contain a partial
commit (the rows preceding the failed one) instead of rolling
back the statement completely. This occurred because the rows
were treated as individual inserts.
As of MySQL 5.0.46, FEDERATED performs
bulk-insert handling such that multiple rows are sent to the
remote table in a batch. This provides a performance
improvement. Also, if the remote table is transactional, it
enables the remote storage engine to perform statement
rollback properly should an error occur. This capability has
the following limitations:
The size of the insert cannot exceed the maximum packet size between servers. If the insert exceeds this size, it is broken into multiple packets and the rollback problem can occur.
Bulk-insert handling does not occur for INSERT
... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE.
There is no way for the FEDERATED engine to
know if the remote table has changed. The reason for this is
that this table must work like a data file that would never be
written to by anything other than the database system. The
integrity of the data in the local table could be breached if
there was any change to the remote database.
Any DROP TABLE statement issued against a
FEDERATED table drops only the local table,
not the remote table.
FEDERATED tables do not work with the query
cache.
Some of these limitations may be lifted in future versions of the
FEDERATED handler.

User Comments
Add your own comment.